Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Incandescent Darkness

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:37, 30 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Incandescent Darkness

This appears to be a non-notable software product, for a company that itself appears to be non-notable. The Evil Spartan (talk) 02:34, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Delisted Not software, game... --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Game-related deletion discussions. -- --/Mendaliv/^2¢/_Δ's/ 02:36, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been added to the list of video game related deletions. MrKIA11 (talk) 02:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - One programmer working on it, release date slipping, might never make it out.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 04:15, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Apparent self-promotion, no secondary sources, no notability. Possibly speedy G11. Ham Pastrami (talk) 07:40, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL -Rushyo (talk) 15:30, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete – WP:CBALL; no sources, no notability, no nothing. MuZemike (talk) 23:01, 24 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. It's an indie development, by the lead developers own description. There is some talk about the game blogs and such but I haven't been able to find any sources to indicate notability. I'm sure there are examples of indie game projects that are notable, but I haven't seen anything to indicate this has been picked up by reputable secondary sources that would indicate this is such an example. Icemotoboy (talk) 22:35, 25 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete fails notability. --SkyWalker (talk) 06:23, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.